This particle, which is called the positron, is the antiparticle of the electron, and it was the first example of antimatter. a proton has a positive electric charge, but an antiproton has a negative electric charge. The existence of antimatter partners for all matter particles is now a well-verified phenomenon, with both partners for hundreds of such pairings observed.
anytime a particle meets its matching antiparticle, the two can annihilate each other, that is, they both disappear, leaving their energy transformed into some other form.
Note: could I use the above as a fictional means of creating a craft propelled by this event, i.e., using the concept of anti-matter?
Modern theories of particle physics and of the evolution of the universe suggest, or even require, that antimatter and matter were equally common.
Note: This would validate the Chinese concept of yin-yang and yin-yang if valid would support and validate the above.
imbalance between matter and antimatter is a puzzle yet to be explained. Without it, the universe today would certainly be a much less interesting place, because there would be essentially no matter left around; annihilations would have converted everything into electromagnetic radiation by now. So clearly this imbalance is a key property of the world we know.
Note: If true, that there has to be an imbalance between matter and anti-matter for the universe to even exist that requires an imbalance from a strict yin-yang concept. This means that if matter exists and anti-matter exists they both must exist and since the two tend to eliminate the other then we have to consider that matter and anti-matter are separated by something allowing for matter to exist therefore out universe to exist. Is it gravity? Is it a dimensional separation? That divide might provide many answers to the matter-n-antimatter conundrum.
subatomic world unfolds: the stranger this world, the quantum world, actually behaves; atoms are made of electrons that whiz around the fixed protons and neutrons in their nuclei, which are made of quarks. These particles all interact with each other by means of "force messenger" particles, such as photons, gluons, W's and Z’s; Particles and anti-particles have the exact same mass and equal, but opposite charges and magnetic moments; if they are unstable, they have the same lifetime; the existence of positively charged electrons. The result was an equation describing both matter and antimatter in terms of quantum fields.
When a particle and its anti-particle collide, they annihilate into energy, which is carried by "force messenger" particles that can subsequently decay into other particles.
the laws of physics treat matter and antimatter almost symmetrically. If the cosmos began with equal amounts of matter and antimatter, where is the antimatter?
Note: Maybe, it is because through the theory to the great tai chi, the yin-yang duality of all existence, our universe is on the far end of the yang, the matter side of yin-yang where yin is the anti-matter side. As indicated by yin-yang there is always movement and it through the connectedness and mutual beneficial relations means that matter and anti-matter exist and shift, change, and ebb-n-flow back and forth explaining the big bang, i.e., when matter and anti-matter are in perfect balance of yin-yang onc or the other reacts causing a bang, i.e., one the big bang that we are aware of today, while the other causes the opposite of the big bang, i.e., likened to the existence of the black hole or some sort of vacuum the reverses the universe, etc. We are currently in the yang of yin-yang and it would seem since the universe is expanding that we have not reached that point that causes a reversal of expansion to contraction. Once contraction exists everything in the universe begins its process of reversal as if we reach old age and the aging process reverses until we revert back to the very seed that caused us to exist through the impregnation of egg and seed. In our universe through the act of contraction will bring us back to the balance point where matter and anti-matter balance out resulting in anti-matter triggering matter out of balance toward dominance of anti-matter creating what ever could exist as the opposite of the Universe - call it the under-verse.
there is an approximate symmetry between matter and antimatter. The small asymmetry is thought to be at least partly responsible for the fact that matter outlives antimatter in our universe.
Note: this could validate my theory because in my description above our current universe presence means matter holds a stronger hold over anti-matter, i.e., anti-matter has the smaller asymmetry so that our universe can exist? It may be our inability to see and believe such things is a result of human psychological reliance on the reliance/compliance principle, i.e., our belief systems of perceptual contrast from our commitment of what we currently know toward our human drive for consistency of past to present effecting our acceptance of things out of that realm for a future new paradigm belief. I quote, “Humans have a nearly obsessive desire to be (and to appear) consistent with what they have already done. We tend to have a strong pull to behave in a consistent manner with any commitment we have made, i.e., we make choices or take a stand so we are strongly pulled to those responses that justify our earlier decisions. What we experience are self-imposed, genetical instinctual if you will, personal and interpersonal pressures to behave consistently with those prior commitments. These pressures move us to respond in ways that justify those earlier decisions.”
Note: In the yin-yang you see the smaller dots of opposite colors and these represent that even in our matter dominant universe there must be a certain amount or level of anti-matter that validates that one cannot live without the other, a small amount is necessary to achieve existence of either matter or anti-matter. If matter and anti-matter at what ever ratio didn’t exist then nothing exists, i.e., there is always a small amount of both that exist together at a ratio that supports its very existence and what makes our universe of mostly matter possible and that smidgeon of anti-matter may be what makes the very fabric that separates the dimensions of our very universe.
Note: It must be considered and remembered that we are subject so the commitment and resistance principle especially when it comes to knowledge and understanding that is often derived strictly from and within our human sensory systems, i.e., sight, sound, touch, smell, etc. We already know that more exists outside of our ability to detect it and detection is often about some form that allows the undetectable to be detected by our sensory systems. We therefor assume that matter obliterates anti-matter and vice-versa but what if something exists as a result of that obliteration that is yet undetectable to us that would mean that matter and antimatter coexist even when it appears to not exist. The obliteration on one or the other may simply push one or the other into a realm or dimension, if you will, that is yet to be detectable and observable to the sensory systems humans are contained and restrained by so our minds can handle things.
Note: Who can truly say without question that matter and anti-matter CANNOT exist together and who says when they do come in contact that the proverbial obliteration of one or the other takes one or the other out of existence when in truth their meeting merely pushes one or the other into some other existence that travels in parallel as if some fabric exists, also undetectable to humans, that allows them to travel the same path where one or the other traverses that fabric for some unknown reason in time, space, gravity and dimension that supports and triggers evolutionary events that actually allowed humans to come into existence.
Note: Is it possible that the existence of gravitational existence is that very fabric that allows the two to exist and when events like black holes, etc. occur those are the breaks between the matter and anti-matter that drive the existence of ‘existence?’
Note: Lets look at matter and anti-matter according to the space-time, focus time, where relativity speaks and the duality of time exists, i.e., the moment vs. the non-moment where non-moment is about the time that has passed and time yet to come is what the moment takes in that moment to create the non-moment that we perceive as the past. Matter when encountering anti-matter doesn’t obliterate it but merely pushes it past the fabric making it not just take another dimensions but merely pushes it a single moment into the past that follows moment-to-moment that present-moment of existence followed by the past-moment that follows creating a chain of past-moments. Our minds perceive a moment only to obliterate it into a past-moment therefore making that moment non-existent except in our memories. Existances is about the moment and the moment of existences is constantly being obliterated to make room for the next moment, i.e., matter obliterates anti-matter to make room for the next moment of existence of the matter aging the universe toward that moment of change from matter with a smidgeon of anti-matter so anti-matter turns into a dominance over matter and so on.
Note: Is it possible that string theory speaks to the very connectedness of matter-n-antimatter existence and is that very fabric made of the strings that connect one to the other for a complete tai chi or yin-yang duality that is the universe?
